Pastel of a field of flowers dissolving into colour, with a reclining figure barely emerging among the blooms.

Survey beta

Agents are the new staff. Give them a standard to work to.

That standard is published here. A survey of AI-era repositories, sorted by the job they do in a company; every entry traces to a recorded search campaign.

A method-curated survey of AI-era repositories, dated 2026-08-10. Not an audit, not an endorsement. Licensing under review.

Ophelia among the Flowers, Odilon Redon, c. 1905–1908.
The National Gallery, London (NG6438). Public domain (PD-Art). Credits

What this is ↓

What this is

You are looking at the public face of a research project about open-source GitHub repositories. We ran 81 recorded search campaigns, one task at a time — interviewing customers, launching a website, auditing a financial model, keeping agents on a leash. Each modern campaign froze its question, screened what it found, and kept a ledger; twelve early campaigns predate that standard and say so with flags instead of counts.

Entries are repositories — libraries, benchmarks, specifications, whatever a ledger admitted as evidence. Some of it is polished; most of it is parts.

The entries here are what those ledgers admitted: 86 entries, contributed by 9 of the campaigns placed on this hub. 10 of the 54 campaigns placed here are marked ingested, and one of them admitted no repositories at all. Ingested means the campaign's ledger was extracted for this site; it does not promise the ledger admitted anything.

Every claim on an entry page comes from its campaign, word for word, with a date. We do not rank anything. We describe repositories in our own words rather than repeating theirs. Numbers carry dates, and absences are labeled.

How the survey works →

The survey behind the registry

Where the searching ended up, dated 2026-08-10.

Six numbers. Five of them are paperwork; the last one is what you can open.

  • 81campaigns on the record
  • 14extracted campaigns ingested (both hubs)
  • 2,937evidence-ledger rows (survey-wide)
  • 7,988screening rows (survey-wide)
  • about 1,246distinct repositories in the tracking cohort
  • 86entries ingested

Method: sealed campaign ledgers; dated, hashed API snapshot. What these numbers do and do not mean →

The categories

Eleven departments, empty ones included.

Start from the job in front of you and pick the department it belongs to.

9 of 52 tasks carry an entry today; the rest show their campaigns and say what is missing. All categories, absences included →

The standard

The standard they work to.

The full standard — what an entry must show and may never show — is published.

9 of 54 campaigns placed on this hub admitted at least one repository; 10 of 54 are marked ingested. The rest are listed with their state shown.

Read the full standard →