Do bring
A repeated practice, a clear user, source permissions, field traces, evaluation criteria, and unresolved questions.
Contribute
Founder Hub is preparing a contribution workflow for reviewable skill kits. Until that workflow lands, the page below is the public contract—not an open submission form.
Contribution status
The registry remains in development preview. We are publishing the expected packet now so prospective contributors can critique the standard and prepare evidence without mistaking an inbox for a review process.
The contribution packet
Name the user, decision, operating context, and cost of a wrong result.
Declare role, procedure, runtime, tools, context, gates, cost meter, and rubric.
Trace sources, adaptations, licenses, assumptions, and the reasoning behind the design.
Include ordinary, edge, and adversarial cases, plus failures and repair notes.
Name who owns updates, how change is recorded, and when the kit should stop being used.
Good contributions are specific
A repeated practice, a clear user, source permissions, field traces, evaluation criteria, and unresolved questions.
A prompt without an operating system, a product pitch, unverifiable performance claims, or borrowed material without provenance.
While submissions are closed